no-cache?

[benjamin1]

Hi,

I was running a server-header reader on different sites and did one on the RB website. I notice it said there was no cache control. I'm assuming this means that RB does not use caching? From what i've read about servers it seems that caching can actually speed up servers. Is this something that RB will have later? or does it do this already?

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:56:03 GMT
Server: Cincom Smalltalk VisualWorks 7.4.1
cache-control: No-cache
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
cache-control: no-cache
expires: -1
pragma: no-cache
mime-version: 1.0
Set-Cookie: VW-WTK-sessionkey=14804834276425633427656963402
Connection: close

[Carl Gundel - admin]

Run BASIC may or may not implement caching in the future, but can get such features by proxying behind apache or something similar.

-Carl

Aug 13, 2009 17:57:20 GMT -5 benjamin1 said:

Hi,

I was running a server-header reader on different sites and did one on the RB website. I notice it said there was no cache control. I'm assuming this means that RB does not use caching? From what i've read about servers it seems that caching can actually speed up servers. Is this something that RB will have later? or does it do this already?

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:56:03 GMT
Server: Cincom Smalltalk VisualWorks 7.4.1
cache-control: No-cache
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
cache-control: no-cache
expires: -1
pragma: no-cache
mime-version: 1.0
Set-Cookie: VW-WTK-sessionkey=14804834276425633427656963402
Connection: close