|
|
Post by Carl Gundel - admin on Jun 8, 2009 20:07:13 GMT -5
Why does tikiwiki take 4 seconds to render a page?
Your RB apps runs fast on your own machine and it runs slow on a hosted server then maybe it's the performance of the server that is the issue?
How much actual (not virtual) RAM does the machine guarantee your applications?
-Carl
|
|
|
|
Post by Carl Gundel - admin on Jun 8, 2009 20:18:19 GMT -5
|
|
neal
Full Member
Posts: 104
|
Post by neal on Jun 8, 2009 20:46:23 GMT -5
That top listing for vwlinux doesn't look right - the cpu usage is awfully high (99%). I would try restarting the Run BASIC server and then retest your programs. Otherwise it could be a configuration issue on the hosting server - my Run BASIC server is running on a single core Intel Mac Mini (ie. pretty slow) and it performs fine (programs are a bit slow on the first page access, but after that they are very quick)
|
|
|
|
Post by Carl Gundel - admin on Jun 9, 2009 10:35:33 GMT -5
Yeah, there shouldn't be a problem with RB in general. It's not a slow system so I'm guessing there's something wrong with the server configuration. There's always the possibility of a bug in RB too.
As for slow initial startup, this is because RB always recompiles each application when it is invoked. I am trying to fix this for the next release.
-Carl
|
|
|
|
Post by davos1 on Jun 9, 2009 11:39:14 GMT -5
Thanks,
Hi, I checked the site weloveashland. an it is faster. So, it seems to be the hosting provider... ufff!
by the way, do you know which provider are you using in weloveashland? is this site hosted in ahosting service or in your home?
maybe I should host the applications there...
yes, RB could be faster if RB recompiles when the user publishes the application and keep it recompiled.
|
|
|
|
Post by Carl Gundel - admin on Jun 9, 2009 17:53:37 GMT -5
Thanks, Hi, I checked the site weloveashland. an it is faster. So, it seems to be the hosting provider... ufff! by the way, do you know which provider are you using in weloveashland? is this site hosted in ahosting service or in your home? maybe I should host the applications there... yes, RB could be faster if RB recompiles when the user publishes the application and keep it recompiled. I run weloveashland.com from my home office. On the same machine that runbasic.com is hosted from. There's really nothing special about the machine. -Carl |
|
|
|
Post by Jerry Muelver on Jun 10, 2009 15:10:14 GMT -5
runbasicnet.com is currently running 17 RB servers simultaneously....  |
|
|
|
Post by benjamin1 on Jun 10, 2009 18:44:46 GMT -5
runbasicnet.com is currently running 17 RB servers simultaneously.... Interesting, would you care to release some information on the type of system you are running and any bandwidth info? (like average hits per day, max users connected at once, etc). I would be interested to see this. I got to redo my server this weekend, you think putting win98 might speed things up? I mean for my situation, cause i'm running windows xp on a PII (i wonder if runbasic will run on reactos?) |
|
|
|
Post by mackrackit on Jun 11, 2009 1:48:17 GMT -5
I got to redo my server this weekend, you think putting win98 might speed things up? I mean for my situation, cause i'm running windows xp on a PII (i wonder if runbasic will run on reactos?) In my opinion I would set up a headless system for your server. No need to use resources running a GUI on a server. I have been using Ubuntu lately and it seems to work well. If you do not want to try setting it up as a headless from the start, you can turn the GUI off after everything is up and running. If for some reason you want the GUI back on to do maintenance you can. Carl has the headless files for RB. Apache and FTPpro run headless. So everything you need is there. |
|
|
|
Post by benjamin1 on Jun 12, 2009 13:29:14 GMT -5
Thanks for the idea, I think i'm gonna try to stick with my current setup before I try something else.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jerry Muelver on Jun 14, 2009 8:18:57 GMT -5
We're running dual-core CPU, 1.86GHz, 2G RAM, 250G hard drive, Windows Server 2003, IIS. Each RB server uses from 13-25Meg RAM, so there's room for about 100 servers. The machine's desktop gets kind of complicated, though. Windows wants a lot of power for its interface.
|
|
|
|
Post by kokenge on Jun 14, 2009 12:28:53 GMT -5
yes, RB could be faster if RB recompiles when the user publishes the application and keep it recompiled.
Yes this would be true if the application contained only one program.
I just counted the programs in one of my applications and there are 66 programs. When the system is complete, it will easily double that.
Basically the only program with the same name as the application is a menu that runs the other programs. Many are then RUN by other programs.
So if this method is used to compile, will it compile all the programs within a project...
Just wondering...
|
|
